Journal article

Nanocrystalline versus microcrystalline Li2O:B2O3 composites:: Anomalous ionic conductivities and percolation theory


Authors listIndris, S; Heitjans, P; Roman, HE; Bunde, A

Publication year2000

Pages2889-2892

JournalPhysical Review Letters

Volume number84

Issue number13

ISSN0031-9007

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2889

PublisherAmerican Physical Society


Abstract
We study ionic transport in nano- and microcrystalline (1 - x)Li2O:xB(2)O(3) composites using standard impedance spectroscopy. In the nanocrystalline samples (average grain size of about 30 nm), the ionic conductivity sigma(dc) increases with increasing content x of B2O3 up to a maximum at x approximate to 0.5. Above x approximate to 0.92, sigma(dc) vanishes. By contrast, in the microcrystalline samples (grain size about 10 mu m), sigma(dc) decreases monotonically with x and vanishes above x approximate to 0.55. We can explain this strikingly different behavior by a percolation model that assumes an enhanced conductivity at the interfaces between insulating and conducting phases in both materials and explicitly takes into account the different grain sizes.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleIndris, S., Heitjans, P., Roman, H. and Bunde, A. (2000) Nanocrystalline versus microcrystalline Li2O:B2O3 composites:: Anomalous ionic conductivities and percolation theory, Physical Review Letters, 84(13), pp. 2889-2892. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2889

APA Citation styleIndris, S., Heitjans, P., Roman, H., & Bunde, A. (2000). Nanocrystalline versus microcrystalline Li2O:B2O3 composites:: Anomalous ionic conductivities and percolation theory. Physical Review Letters. 84(13), 2889-2892. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2889


Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 06:20