Journalartikel

Comparison of Lea single symbols and Landolt single optotypes


AutorenlisteGräf, M; Becker, R

Jahr der Veröffentlichung1999

Seiten86-90

ZeitschriftKlinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde

Bandnummer215

Heftnummer2

ISSN0023-2165

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1034677

VerlagGeorg Thieme Verlag


Abstract

Purpose Lea (LH) symbols seem to be favourable for visual acuity assessment in childhood. The symbols of the LH test are well standardized and applicable to preschool children. We compared the visual acuity determined by LH single symbols (LH) and the acuity measured with the Landolt-C (LC).

Patients and methods 138 cooperative subjects aged 7 to 91 years were examined. Their visual acuity was either normal or reduced due to various etiologies. Their refractive error was corrected. The monocular LW and LC were determined by a 3/4 criterion (study 1). In 19 healthy subjects aged 21 to 58 years, acuity was reduced stepwise by 5 different calibrated occlusives (study 2). A Lighthouse single symbol book (LH symbols) was used at a distance of 3 m. LC was determined at a distance of 5 m, The luminance of the test field was 180-200 cd/m(2). The right eye of each patient and the amblyopic eye of the squinting patients was taken for statistical evaluation. The strabismic patients' interocular differences of LC and LH were compared.

Results Within study 1, LC ranged from 0.02 to 2.0 and LH from 0.03 to 2.5. LH overestimated LC by 1.4 lines on an average (t-test p < 0.0001). The regression equation IgLH = 0.95 IgLC + 0.11 describes a high correlation (r = 0.95) between LH and LC. The relations between LPI and LC of 43 strabismic amblyopic patients and the remaining subjects did not significantly differ. Due to the criterion of an interocular LH-difference >1 line, 85.7% resp. 90% of the strabismic amblyopic patients with an interocular LC difference >1 resp >2 lines were detected. In study 2, LC ranged from 0.1 to 1.6, LH from 0.12 to 2.0. The mean difference LH-LC was 1.3 lines. The regression equation was IgLH = 0.91 IgLC + 0.08 (r = 0.95).

Conclusion LH symbols allow a reliable measurement of recognition acuity. Due to the design of the symbols, they are excellently suitable for application to preschool children. Age related normal values should be established. The systematic difference between the LC acuity and the LH acuity measured with the Lighthouse LW single symbol book by 1.4 lines has to be considered.




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilGräf, M. and Becker, R. (1999) Comparison of Lea single symbols and Landolt single optotypes, Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 215(2), pp. 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1034677

APA-ZitierstilGräf, M., & Becker, R. (1999). Comparison of Lea single symbols and Landolt single optotypes. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 215(2), 86-90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1034677



Schlagwörter


Lea symbolsLH test visual acuityPRESCHOOLVISUAL-ACUITY


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 06:36