Journal article

ON THE CONTROVERSY OVER HUNTINGTON EQUATIONS - WHEN ARE SUCH EQUATIONS MEANINGFUL


Authors listWILLE, R; WILLE, U

Publication year1993

Pages173-180

JournalMathematical Social Sciences

Volume number25

Issue number2

ISSN0165-4896

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90051-J

PublisherElsevier


Abstract
Huntington's equations consist of ratios of two variables equal to a third variable. The meaningfulness of such equations gave rise to a strong controversy because, in Huntington's context, those variables seem to capture only ordinal relationships. We show that simple ordinal axioms already allow a coordinatization by ordered loops which guarantees meaningfulness as defined in measurement theory. Further axioms even yield a meaningful representation by real numbers. The crucial question remains whether the ordinal axioms can be empirically justified in Huntington's field of application.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleWILLE, R. and WILLE, U. (1993) ON THE CONTROVERSY OVER HUNTINGTON EQUATIONS - WHEN ARE SUCH EQUATIONS MEANINGFUL, Mathematical Social Sciences, 25(2), pp. 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90051-J

APA Citation styleWILLE, R., & WILLE, U. (1993). ON THE CONTROVERSY OVER HUNTINGTON EQUATIONS - WHEN ARE SUCH EQUATIONS MEANINGFUL. Mathematical Social Sciences. 25(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(93)90051-J



Keywords


HUNTINGTON EQUATIONSPOLITICAL INSTABILITYPolitical participationSOCIAL FRUSTRATIONSOCIAL MOBILIZATION

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 06:31