Conference paper

Advantages and disadvantages of conservation and no-tillage compared to plough tillage


Authors listTebrügge, F.; Gross, U.; Düring, R.A.; Böhrnsen, A.

Appeared inProceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference

Editor listSalokhe, V. M.

Publication year1994

Pages139-148

ISBN974-8256-14-6

ConferenceInternational Agricultural Engineering Conference


Abstract

Interactions in the soil agro-ecosystem caused by different soil tillage systems were investigated in Germany in a series of field trials with different tillage systems, soil types (sand, loam, clay), and different crop rotations. The tillage systems were (in order of decreasing contact intensity): plough and secondary tillage, chisel plough with rotary harrow, wing share cultivator and rotary harrow, vertical rotary harrow, rotary harrow air seeding, and no-tillage. The effects of the different tillage systems on agrotechnical aspects, soil physical and biological properties, aggregate stability and surface sealing, the fate of herbicides in the soil, and plant yields and production costs were compared.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleTebrügge, F., Gross, U., Düring, R. and Böhrnsen, A. (1994) Advantages and disadvantages of conservation and no-tillage compared to plough tillage, in Salokhe, V. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference. Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology. pp. 139-148

APA Citation styleTebrügge, F., Gross, U., Düring, R., & Böhrnsen, A. (1994). Advantages and disadvantages of conservation and no-tillage compared to plough tillage. In Salokhe, V. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Agricultural Engineering Conference. (pp. 139-148). Asian Institute of Technology.


Last updated on 2025-21-08 at 15:16