Conference paper

Comparison of different field and laboratory methods assessing the fate of herbicides in the soil


Authors listDüring, R..A.; Hummel, H.E.

Appeared inThird Congress of the European Society for Agronomy: proceedings

Editor listBorin, M.; Sattin, M.

Publication year1994

Pages792-793

ISBN2-9505124-1-0

Conference3rd Congress of the European Society for Agronomy


Abstract

Dissipation and translocation of terbuthylazine and metolachlor in the field in 1991 were estimated after spraying a commercial preparation and taking soil samples at fixed intervals and depths. The field trial was extended by a simple degradation study at the laboratory scale using undisturbed columns of sandy soil. In the field trial, terbuthylazine showed relatively low dissipation and translocation into the deeper soil layers. Its more mobile metabolites, desethyl-ter-buthylazine and hydroxy-terbuthylazine were detected in the deeper soil layers. The laboratory studies gave similar results, with a DT50 value of about 29 d. Metolachlor had a DT50 of about 13 d. Metolachlor was easily translocated through the soil. It is concluded that trials with undisturbed soil columns are a useful adjunct to field and laboratory tests.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleDüring, R. and Hummel, H. (1994) Comparison of different field and laboratory methods assessing the fate of herbicides in the soil, in Borin, M. and Sattin, M. (eds.) Third Congress of the European Society for Agronomy: proceedings. Colmar: European Society of Agronomy. pp. 792-793

APA Citation styleDüring, R., & Hummel, H. (1994). Comparison of different field and laboratory methods assessing the fate of herbicides in the soil. In Borin, M., & Sattin, M. (Eds.), Third Congress of the European Society for Agronomy: proceedings. (pp. 792-793). European Society of Agronomy.


Last updated on 2025-21-08 at 15:23