Journal article

Entscheidungsansatz zwischen Plattenosteosynthese versus Endoprothese bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen des rheumatischen Schultergelenks


Authors listBiehl, Christoph; Meyer, Anna-Catarina; Seidl, Maren; Heiss, Christian; Rupp, Markus; El Khassawna, Thaqif

Publication year2025

Pages365-372

JournalZeitschrift für Rheumatologie

Volume number84

Issue number5

ISSN0340-1855

eISSN1435-1250

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-025-01656-6

PublisherSpringer


Abstract
The shoulder joint is involved in a high percentage of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases. At the same time, patients with RA develop osteoporosis at an early stage, which significantly increases the risk of fracture. In recent years, joint-preserving procedures with stable-angle implants have become available for individuals with low disease activity and good medication control. However, this approach is dependent on the fracture morphology and, if not adequately addressed, is associated with a high rate of revision surgery. In rotator cuff reconstruction, recent data show encouraging results regarding regenerative capacity, which does not necessarily indicate immediate reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Follow-up treatment must consider delayed osseous healing.



Authors/Editors




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleBiehl, C., Meyer, A., Seidl, M., Heiss, C., Rupp, M. and El Khassawna, T. (2025) Entscheidungsansatz zwischen Plattenosteosynthese versus Endoprothese bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen des rheumatischen Schultergelenks, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie, 84(5), pp. 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-025-01656-6

APA Citation styleBiehl, C., Meyer, A., Seidl, M., Heiss, C., Rupp, M., & El Khassawna, T. (2025). Entscheidungsansatz zwischen Plattenosteosynthese versus Endoprothese bei proximalen Humerusfrakturen des rheumatischen Schultergelenks. Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie. 84(5), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-025-01656-6


Last updated on 2025-26-09 at 11:56