Contribution in an anthology

Using trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for resource management


Authors listDomptail, SE; Nuppenau, EA; Azebaze, N; Brown, LD; Falk, T; Finckh, M; Große, LM; Kowalski, B; Pöpper, M; Stellmes, M; Overmann, J

Appeared inEnvironmental assessments in the Okavango region

Editor listOdeland, J.; Erb, C.; Finck, M.; Jürgens, N.

Publication year2013

Pages185-193

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00274

Title of seriesBiodiversity & ecology

Number in series5


Abstract

Trade-off analysis can be defined as an approach to natural resource management that incorporates multiple objectives for the management of a given area (and its resources) within a decision framework. The analysis of trade-off or synergetic relationships among multiple objectives for a given system is essential for the implementation of interdisciplinary (ecological, social and economic) research results into policy making. While research concerning trade-offs in ecosystem services (ESS) is still nascent, several types of trade-offs/synergies have already been investigated, including spatial trade-offs in the provision of ESSs, temporal trade-offs, trade-offs related to stakeholder values, as well as trade-offs between causally related ESSs (such as provisioning and regulating or supporting services), and trade-offs between economic, social and ecological objectives in land use. The last two types of trade-offs address directly the issue of sustainability. Methods of investigation aim at (1) the quantification of trade-offs/synergies using an array of tools borrowed from modeling, behavioral economics, econometrics, etc.… or/and (2) at ranking ESSs via e.g. multi-criteria analyses (MCA). The Future Okavango (TFO) research project intends to incorporate trade-off analysis in its assessment of ESS in order to support management decisions at the scale of the river basin in the Okavango region. It uses a variety of methods which complement one another and enable the incorporation of the concept of ESS into decision making. A description of the ESSs compared using trade-off analysis, as well as of the methods used and their interrelations constitutes the second part of the paper.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleDomptail, S., Nuppenau, E., Azebaze, N., Brown, L., Falk, T., Finckh, M., et al. (2013) Using trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for resource management, in Odeland, J., Erb, C., Finck, M. and Jürgens, N. (eds.) Environmental assessments in the Okavango region. Hamburg: BEE, pp. 185-193. https://doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00274

APA Citation styleDomptail, S., Nuppenau, E., Azebaze, N., Brown, L., Falk, T., Finckh, M., Große, L., Kowalski, B., Pöpper, M., Stellmes, M., & Overmann, J. (2013). Using trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for resource management. In Odeland, J., Erb, C., Finck, M., & Jürgens, N. (Eds.), Environmental assessments in the Okavango region (pp. 185-193). BEE. https://doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00274


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 15:53