Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Hartl, J; Herrmann, R
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2009
Seiten: 551-560
Zeitschrift: Agricultural Economics: the journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists
Bandnummer: 40
Heftnummer: 5
ISSN: 0169-5150
eISSN: 1574-0862
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00397.x
Verlag: Wiley
Abstract:
European consumers and, in particular, German consumers are known to be very critical toward the introduction of genetically modified (GM) foods. It is analyzed here whether German consumers do reject second-generation GM foods, too. Whereas first-generation GM crops induced producer-related benefits, second-generation GM crops are associated with consumer-oriented benefits like an improvement of nutritional quality. The determinants of demand for second-generation GM rapeseed oil are investigated within an online survey of 1,556 German consumers. It is elaborated how two functional properties of the product matter; that is, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids and the cholesterol-lowering effect of phytosterols. It turns out that GM rapeseed oil is neglected by 74% of all respondents. Output traits, however, will increase the probability of purchases of GM rapeseed oil. This is more the case for long-chain omega-3 fatty acids than for phytosterols.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Hartl, J. and Herrmann, R. (2009) Do they always say no? German consumers and second-generation GM foods, Agricultural Economics: the journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, 40(5), pp. 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00397.x
APA-Zitierstil: Hartl, J., & Herrmann, R. (2009). Do they always say no? German consumers and second-generation GM foods. Agricultural Economics: the journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists. 40(5), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00397.x