Journal article
Authors list: Nuppenau, EA
Publication year: 2015
Pages: 182-196
Journal: Universal Journal of Agricultural Research
Volume number: 3
Issue number: 6
ISSN: 2332-2268
eISSN: 2332-2284
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2015.030602
Publisher: Horizon Research Publishing Corporation (HRPUB)
Abstract:
There is a challenging debate on better ways of linking food production to reproduction of biological resources in agriculture. Currently, food production is mostly considered to be a part of agri-business which uses to profit maximization. This can result in resource depletion and industrial farming working against sustainability. However, peasant economies goals are broader than profit maximization, including reproduction of nature. We use this notion for a revision of objectives. The hypothesis introduced here is as follows: reproduction and production (as goals) are to be connected by joint accounting. The issue is addressed through an approach of energy accounting and through the application of a shadow price analysis. This paper explores how one can apply programming techniques to derive behavioural equations based on energy spending and shadow prices. It is shown how conditional behavioural equations can be readjusted and linked in a system analysis. The adjustment is done in a quasi-market mode, i.e. offered shadow price equivalents are "artificially equated", which provides a joint optimum. As a result, an optimal population for reproduction fitting the slogan of "living within limits" is achieved, i.e. natural reproduction corresponds to food production.
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Nuppenau, E. (2015) What Can Georgescu-Roegen Tell Us Today? On Reproduction, Production, and Sustainability in Peasant Economy Modelling, Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(6), pp. 182-196. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2015.030602
APA Citation style: Nuppenau, E. (2015). What Can Georgescu-Roegen Tell Us Today? On Reproduction, Production, and Sustainability in Peasant Economy Modelling. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research. 3(6), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujar.2015.030602