Journal article

Values, norms and peer effects on weight status


Authors listNie, P.; Gwozdz, W.; Reisch, L.; Sousa-Poza, A.

Publication year2017

JournalJournal of Obesity

Volume number2017

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849674

PublisherWiley


Abstract

This study uses data from the European Social Survey in order to test the Prinstein-Dodge hypothesis that posits that peer effects may be larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. When defining individualism and collectivism at the country level, our results show that peer effects on obesity are indeed larger in collectivistic than in individualistic societies. However, when defining individualism and collectivism with individual values based on the Shalom Schwartz universal values theory, we find little support for this hypothesis.




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleNie, P., Gwozdz, W., Reisch, L. and Sousa-Poza, A. (2017) Values, norms and peer effects on weight status, Journal of Obesity, 2017, Article 2849674. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849674

APA Citation styleNie, P., Gwozdz, W., Reisch, L., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2017). Values, norms and peer effects on weight status. Journal of Obesity. 2017, Article 2849674. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2849674


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 16:18