Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Meyer, KG; Fasshauer, M; Nebel, IT; Paschke, R
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2004
Seiten: 353-360
Zeitschrift: Patient Education and Counseling
Bandnummer: 54
Heftnummer: 3
ISSN: 0738-3991
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.006
Verlag: Elsevier
Abstract:
Gluten-free diet (GFD) protects against the complications of celiac disease (CD). However, training in the dietetic field is rare in Germany. Thus, CD patients are likely to benefit from a computer-based interactive training program (CBITP) combined with interactive exercises. We compared a CBITP and a conventional training for CD patients regarding increased knowledge, transferability and sustainability. In that context we analyzed whether CD patients are more able to judge the risk of a food or a situation after practicing with the interactive training software. Sixty-four CD patients were included and randomized in two groups. While the first group used the CBITP, the control group received written instructions. Before and after taking part in the training program and 3 weeks later, the participants filled in a questionnaire for celiac knowledge. The results show that both intervention and control groups increased knowledge about CD. However, the intervention group showed significantly better outcome. A CBITP significantly increases knowledge and sustainability as compared to a conventional training for CD patients. CBITPs can enhance patients' training and treatment. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Meyer, K., Fasshauer, M., Nebel, I. and Paschke, R. (2004) Comparative analysis of conventional training and a computer-based interactive training program for Celiac disease patients, Patient Education and Counseling, 54(3), pp. 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.006
APA-Zitierstil: Meyer, K., Fasshauer, M., Nebel, I., & Paschke, R. (2004). Comparative analysis of conventional training and a computer-based interactive training program for Celiac disease patients. Patient Education and Counseling. 54(3), 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2003.12.006
