Journal article

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase from the non-genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE-TN


Authors listEFSA CEP Panel; Lambré, C; Baviera, JMB; Bolognesi, C; Cocconcelli, PS; Crebelli, R; Gott, DM; Grob, K; Lampi, E; Mengelers, M; Mortensen, A; Rivière, G; Steffensen, IL; Tlustos, C; Van Loveren, H; Vernis, L; Zorn, H; Herman, L; Roos, Y; Aguilera, J; Andryszkiewicz, M; Liu, Y; Lunardi, S; Nielsen, E; Nørby, K; Chesson, A,

Publication year2023

JournalEFSA Journal

Volume number21

Issue number2

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828

PublisherWiley


Abstract

The food enzyme endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase (3-(1–3;1–4)-β-d-glucan 3(4)-glucanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.6) is produced with the non-genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE-TN by Amano Enzyme Inc. The food enzyme was shown to contain viable cells of the production strain, which belongs to a species that has been implicated in opportunistic infections in humans. The food enzyme is intended to be used in baking processes and yeast processing. Dietary exposure to the food enzyme total organic solids (TOS) was estimated to be up to 1.75 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not raise a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1,788 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which, when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 1,022. A search for the similarity of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. The Panel considered that, under the intended conditions of use, the risk of allergic reactions by dietary exposure cannot be excluded, but the likelihood for this to occur is low. However, due to the presence of viable cells of the production strain in the food enzyme, the Panel concluded that the food enzyme cannot be considered safe.




Authors/Editors




Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleEFSA CEP Panel, Lambré, C., Baviera, J., Bolognesi, C., Cocconcelli, P., Crebelli, R., et al. (2023) Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase from the non-genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE-TN, EFSA Journal, 21(2), Article e07828. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828

APA Citation styleEFSA CEP Panel, Lambré, C., Baviera, J., Bolognesi, C., Cocconcelli, P., Crebelli, R., Gott, D., Grob, K., Lampi, E., Mengelers, M., Mortensen, A., Rivière, G., Steffensen, I., Tlustos, C., Van Loveren, H., Vernis, L., Zorn, H., Herman, L., Roos, Y., ...Chesson, A. (2023). Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase from the non-genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE-TN. EFSA Journal. 21(2), Article e07828. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7828


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 16:51