Journal article

Publication year: 2015

Pages: 184-193

Journal: Acta Psychologica

Volume number: 160

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.011

Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract: 

This study investigates the interpretative bias in spider phobia with respect to rapid visuomotor processing. We compared perception, evaluation, and visuomotor processing of ambiguous schematic stimuli between spider-fearful and control participants. Stimuli were produced by gradually morphing schematic flowers into spiders. Participants rated these stimuli related to their perceptual appearance and to their feelings of valence, disgust, and arousal. Also, they responded to the same stimuli within a response priming paradigm that measures rapid motor activation. Spider-fearful individuals showed an interpretative bias (i.e., ambiguous stimuli were perceived as more similar to spiders) and rated spider-like stimuli as more unpleasant, disgusting, and arousing. However, we observed no differences between spider-fearful and control participants in priming effects for ambiguous stimuli For non-ambiguous stimuli, we observed a similar enhancement for phobic pictures as has been reported previously for natural images. We discuss our findings with respect to the visual representation of morphed stimuli and to perceptual learning processes.

Harvard Citation style: Haberkamp, A. and Schmidt, F. (2015) Interpretative bias in spider phobia: Perception and information processing of ambiguous schematic stimuli, Acta Psychologica, 160, pp. 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.011

APA Citation style: Haberkamp, A., & Schmidt, F. (2015). Interpretative bias in spider phobia: Perception and information processing of ambiguous schematic stimuli. Acta Psychologica. 160, 184-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.011