Journalartikel

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2020

Seiten: 509-519

Zeitschrift: Journal of the Society for Information Display

Bandnummer: 28

Heftnummer: 6

ISSN: 1071-0922

eISSN: 1938-3657

Open Access Status: Hybrid

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.912

Verlag: Wiley

Abstract: 
We used perceptual and oculomotor measures to understand the negative impacts of low (phantom array) and high (motion blur) duty cycles with a high-speed, AR-likehead-mounted display prototype. We observed large intersubject variability for the detection of phantom array artifacts but a highly consistent and systematic effect on saccadic eye movement targeting during low duty cycle presentations. This adverse effect on saccade endpoints was also related to an increased error rate in a perceptual discrimination task, showing a direct effect of display duty cycle on the perceptual quality. For high duty cycles, the probability of detecting motion blur increased during head movements, and this effect was elevated at lower refresh rates. We did not find an impact of the temporal display characteristics on compensatory eye movements during head motion (e.g., VOR). Together, our results allow us to quantify the tradeoff of different negative spatiotemporal impacts of user movements and make subsequent recommendations for optimized temporal HMD parameters.

Harvard-Zitierstil: Goettker, A., MacKenzie, K. and Murdison, T. (2020) Differences between oculomotor and perceptual artifacts for temporally limited head mounted displays, Journal of the Society for Information Display, 28(6), pp. 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.912

APA-Zitierstil: Goettker, A., MacKenzie, K., & Murdison, T. (2020). Differences between oculomotor and perceptual artifacts for temporally limited head mounted displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 28(6), 509-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.912