The pragmatic organization of the Kepler/Röslin/Feselius controversy on the scientific status of astrology (1609/1611) - Research portal of Justus Liebig University Giessen:

Contribution in an anthology

The pragmatic organization of the Kepler/Röslin/Feselius controversy on the scientific status of astrology (1609/1611)

Authors list: Gloning, Thomas

Appeared in: Historical Pragmatics of Controversies. Case studies from 1600 to 1800

Editor list: Fritz, Gerd; Gloning, Thomas; Glüer, Juliane

Publication year: 2018

Pages: 38-93

ISBN: 978-90-272-0098-3

eISBN: 978-90-272-6388-9

DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.14

Title of series: Controversies

Number in series: 14

Authors/Editors

- Uni.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Michael Gloning

Citation Styles

Harvard Citation style: Gloning, T. (2018) The pragmatic organization of the Kepler/Röslin/Feselius controversy on the scientific status of astrology (1609/1611), in Fritz, G., Gloning, T. and Glüer, J. (eds.) Historical Pragmatics of Controversies. Case studies from 1600 to 1800. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 38-93. https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.14

APA Citation style: Gloning, T. (2018). The pragmatic organization of the Kepler/Röslin/Feselius controversy on the scientific status of astrology (1609/1611). In Fritz, G., Gloning, T., & Glüer, J. (Eds.), Historical Pragmatics of Controversies. Case studies from 1600 to 1800 (pp. 38-93). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.14