Journal article
Authors list: Gabrio, T; Creutznacher, H; Fischer, G; Herold, T; Kämpfer, P; Philipp, W; Rabe, R; Tesseraux, J; Weidner, U
Publication year: 2004
Pages: 295-299
Journal: Gefahrstoffe - Reinhaltung der Luft
Volume number: 64
Issue number: 6
ISSN: 0039-0771, 0949-8036
Publisher: Springer-VDI-Verl.
With the release of the guidelines VDI 4252 part 2 and VDI 4253 part 2 there was a necessity to check the random errors the methods are afflicted with. The results presented here enable the user of these guidelines to judge the efficiency as well as the weak points of the method. The user is given advice, how to improve and check the significance of his own results and weather the sampling works correctly. We point out the extreme importance of an external quality assurance for the sampling and the detection of moulds.
Abstract:
Citation Styles
Harvard Citation style: Gabrio, T., Creutznacher, H., Fischer, G., Herold, T., Kämpfer, P., Philipp, W., et al. (2004) Ergebnis eines Probenaustauschs gemäß Richtlinien VDI 4252 Blatt 2 und VDI 4253 Blatt2, Gefahrstoffe - Reinhaltung der Luft, 64(6), pp. 295-299
APA Citation style: Gabrio, T., Creutznacher, H., Fischer, G., Herold, T., Kämpfer, P., Philipp, W., Rabe, R., Tesseraux, J., & Weidner, U. (2004). Ergebnis eines Probenaustauschs gemäß Richtlinien VDI 4252 Blatt 2 und VDI 4253 Blatt2. Gefahrstoffe - Reinhaltung der Luft. 64(6), 295-299.
