Journal article

Vote Buying or (Political) Business (Cycles) as Usual?


Authors listAidt, Toke; Asatryan, Zareh; Badalyan, Lusine; Heinemann, Friedrich

Publication year2020

Pages409-425

JournalThe Review of Economics and Statistics

Volume number102

Issue number3

ISSN0034-6535

eISSN1530-9142

Open access statusGreen

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00820

PublisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology Press


Abstract
We report robust evidence of a new short-run monetary election cycle: the monthly growth rate of the money supply (M1) around elections is higher than in other months in a sample of low- and middle-income countries. We hypothesize this is related to systemic vote buying. Consistent with this, we find no cycle in authoritarian countries and countries with strong political institutions and a pronounced cycle in elections where international election monitors reported vote buying or in close elections. Using survey data on daily consumer expenditures, we show that within-household consumption of food increases in the days before elections.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleAidt, T., Asatryan, Z., Badalyan, L. and Heinemann, F. (2020) Vote Buying or (Political) Business (Cycles) as Usual?, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(3), pp. 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00820

APA Citation styleAidt, T., Asatryan, Z., Badalyan, L., & Heinemann, F. (2020). Vote Buying or (Political) Business (Cycles) as Usual?. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 102(3), 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00820



Keywords


BUDGET CYCLESCENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCECONSUMPTION RESPONSECORRUPTIONCREDIBILITYDEBT

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 11:13