Journalartikel
Autorenliste: Kempa, Karol; Rusch, Hannes
Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 2019
Seiten: 500-514
Zeitschrift: Managerial and Decision Economics
Bandnummer: 40
Heftnummer: 5
ISSN: 0143-6570
eISSN: 1099-1468
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019
Verlag: Wiley
Abstract:
This paper provides an empirical investigation of misconducts in contests based on data from European football. We extend previous studies by differentiating between dissents with the referee and misconducts directly aimed at sabotaging the competitor. We find that sabotage is more likely committed by teams with lower ability. Dissent is more likely to be shown by teams lagging behind in score and by away teams. We further find that captains engage more in sabotage during important matches and challenge referees' decisions immediately after sanctions of teammates. Finally, we also observe a deterrence effect of sanctions on all types of misconduct.
Zitierstile
Harvard-Zitierstil: Kempa, K. and Rusch, H. (2019) Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football, Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(5), pp. 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019
APA-Zitierstil: Kempa, K., & Rusch, H. (2019). Dissent, sabotage, and leader behaviour in contests: Evidence from European football. Managerial and Decision Economics. 40(5), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3019
Schlagwörter
ENGLISH; FAVORITISM; INCONSISTENT; REFEREES; SPORT; TEAM ATTRIBUTIONS; TOURNAMENTS