Journalartikel

Second-order beliefs in reputation systems with endogenous evaluations - an experimental study


AutorenlisteGreiff, Matthias; Paetzel, Fabian

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2016

Seiten32-43

ZeitschriftGames and Economic Behavior

Bandnummer97

ISSN0899-8256

eISSN1090-2473

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.009

VerlagElsevier


Abstract
We investigate a repeated public good game with group size two and stranger matching. Contributions are public information and each participant evaluates her partner's contribution. At the beginning of each period, participants receive information regarding the evaluation of the previous period. Evaluations are subjective judgments, hence our reputation system allows for some degree of noise. There are two information treatments: Each participant receives information either about her partner's evaluation, or about her own and her partner's evaluation. The results show that although participants condition their contributions on their partners' evaluations, this information alone is insufficient to raise contributions. Only if participants also know their own evaluations, we find an increase in contributions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.



Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilGreiff, M. and Paetzel, F. (2016) Second-order beliefs in reputation systems with endogenous evaluations - an experimental study, Games and Economic Behavior, 97, pp. 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.009

APA-ZitierstilGreiff, M., & Paetzel, F. (2016). Second-order beliefs in reputation systems with endogenous evaluations - an experimental study. Games and Economic Behavior. 97, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.02.009



Schlagwörter


CONDITIONAL COOPERATIONEndogenous evaluationsGAMEIndirect reciprocityINDIRECT RECIPROCITYMonetaryNoisy reputationSecond-order beliefsVOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS


Nachhaltigkeitsbezüge


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-02-04 um 01:47