Journal article

The effectiveness of cohesive and diversified networks: A meta-analysis


Authors listRauch, Andreas; Rosenbusch, Nina; Unger, Jens; Frese, Michael

Publication year2016

Pages554-568

JournalJournal of Business Research

Volume number69

Issue number2

ISSN0148-2963

eISSN1873-7978

Open access statusGreen

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.011

PublisherElsevier


Abstract
The entrepreneurship literature recognizes the substantial contributions of networks to firm performance. However, the circumstances under which cohesive versus diversified networks drive firm performance remain unclear. To rectify this situation, the present meta-analysis integrates the results of 68 independent samples (N = 16,364). The findings indicate both cohesive and diversified networks relate to performance (r(c) = .164 and r(c) = .182). Moderator analyses suggest that diversified networks are particularly effective for large firms, firms competing in innovative industries and in well-developed financial markets. Cohesive networks relate to performance in small firms but not in large firms. These findings suggest that the relationship between networks and performance is context-dependent. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleRauch, A., Rosenbusch, N., Unger, J. and Frese, M. (2016) The effectiveness of cohesive and diversified networks: A meta-analysis, Journal of Business Research, 69(2), pp. 554-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.011

APA Citation styleRauch, A., Rosenbusch, N., Unger, J., & Frese, M. (2016). The effectiveness of cohesive and diversified networks: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research. 69(2), 554-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.011



Keywords


BUSINESS PERFORMANCECohesiveDiversifiedENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATIONfirm performanceHIGH-TECHNOLOGYHUMAN-RESOURCE PRACTICESMANAGERIAL TIESSOCIAL NETWORKSSTRUCTURAL HOLESVENTURE PERFORMANCE

Last updated on 2025-10-06 at 10:34