Journal article

INCOMPLETE INFORMATION STRENGTHENS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOCIAL APPROVAL


Authors listGreiff, Matthias; Paetzel, Fabian

Publication year2015

Pages557-573

JournalEconomic Inquiry

Volume number53

Issue number1

ISSN0095-2583

eISSN1465-7295

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12134

PublisherWiley


Abstract
We present a theoretical model of a public good game in which the expression of social approval induces pro-social behavior. Using a laboratory experiment with earned heterogeneous endowments, we test our model. The main hypothesis is that the expression of social approval increases cooperative behavior even if reputation building is impossible. We vary the information available and investigate how this affects the expression of social approval and individual contributions. The expression of social approval significantly increases contributions. However, the increase is smaller if additional information is provided, suggesting that social approval is more effective if subjects receive a noisy signal about others' contributions. (JEL C72, C91, D71, D83)



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleGreiff, M. and Paetzel, F. (2015) INCOMPLETE INFORMATION STRENGTHENS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOCIAL APPROVAL, Economic Inquiry, 53(1), pp. 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12134

APA Citation styleGreiff, M., & Paetzel, F. (2015). INCOMPLETE INFORMATION STRENGTHENS THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOCIAL APPROVAL. Economic Inquiry. 53(1), 557-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12134



Keywords


DICTATOR GAMESMonetaryPEER PRESSUREPUBLIC-GOODS EXPERIMENTS

Last updated on 2025-02-04 at 02:08