Journalartikel

Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams


AutorenlisteLam, Catherine K.; Van der Vegt, Gerben S.; Walter, Frank; Huang, Xu

Jahr der Veröffentlichung2011

Seiten588-601

ZeitschriftJournal of Applied Psychology

Bandnummer96

Heftnummer3

ISSN0021-9010

eISSN1939-1854

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882

VerlagAmerican Psychological Association


Abstract
This study developed a multilevel model of the interpersonal harming behavior associated with social comparison processes in work teams. We tested this model using temporally lagged data from a sample of student teams (Study 1) and cross-sectional data from a sample of work teams in a telecommunication services company (Study 2). In both studies, social relations analyses revealed that in teams with less cooperative goals, comparison to a higher performing team member was positively associated with interpersonal harming behavior, but only when expectations of future performance similarity to that member were low. The interactive relationship of social comparison and expected future performance similarity with interpersonal harming was buffered, however, in teams with more cooperative goals.



Autoren/Herausgeber




Zitierstile

Harvard-ZitierstilLam, C., Van der Vegt, G., Walter, F. and Huang, X. (2011) Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), pp. 588-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882

APA-ZitierstilLam, C., Van der Vegt, G., Walter, F., & Huang, X. (2011). Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96(3), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882


Zuletzt aktualisiert 2025-21-05 um 17:15