Journal article

Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams


Authors listLam, Catherine K.; Van der Vegt, Gerben S.; Walter, Frank; Huang, Xu

Publication year2011

Pages588-601

JournalJournal of Applied Psychology

Volume number96

Issue number3

ISSN0021-9010

eISSN1939-1854

DOI Linkhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882

PublisherAmerican Psychological Association


Abstract
This study developed a multilevel model of the interpersonal harming behavior associated with social comparison processes in work teams. We tested this model using temporally lagged data from a sample of student teams (Study 1) and cross-sectional data from a sample of work teams in a telecommunication services company (Study 2). In both studies, social relations analyses revealed that in teams with less cooperative goals, comparison to a higher performing team member was positively associated with interpersonal harming behavior, but only when expectations of future performance similarity to that member were low. The interactive relationship of social comparison and expected future performance similarity with interpersonal harming was buffered, however, in teams with more cooperative goals.



Citation Styles

Harvard Citation styleLam, C., Van der Vegt, G., Walter, F. and Huang, X. (2011) Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), pp. 588-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882

APA Citation styleLam, C., Van der Vegt, G., Walter, F., & Huang, X. (2011). Harming high performers: A social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96(3), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021882


Last updated on 2025-21-05 at 17:15