The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy - Forschungsportal der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen:

Sammelbandbeitrag

The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy

Autorenliste: Gloning, Thomas

Erschienen in: Historical dialogue analysis

Herausgeberliste: Jucker, A.H.; Fritz, G.; Lebsanft, F.

Jahr der Veröffentlichung: 1999

Seiten: 81-110

ISBN: 90-272-5080-4

Serientitel: Pragmatics & beyond. New series

Serienzählung: 66

Autoren/Herausgeber

- Uni.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Michael Gloning

Zitierstile

Harvard-Zitierstil: Gloning, T. (1999) The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy, in Jucker, A., Fritz, G. and Lebsanft, F. (eds.) Historical dialogue analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 81-110

APA-Zitierstil: Gloning, T. (1999). The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy. In Jucker, A., Fritz, G., & Lebsanft, F. (Eds.), Historical dialogue analysis (pp. 81-110). Benjamins.