The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy - Research portal of Justus Liebig University Giessen:

Contribution in an anthology

The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy

Authors list: Gloning, Thomas

Appeared in: Historical dialogue analysis

Editor list: Jucker, A.H.; Fritz, G.; Lebsanft, F.

Publication year: 1999

Pages: 81-110

ISBN: 90-272-5080-4

Title of series: Pragmatics & beyond. New series

Number in series: 66

Authors/Editors

- Uni.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Michael Gloning

Citation Styles

Harvard Citation style: Gloning, T. (1999) The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy, in Jucker, A., Fritz, G. and Lebsanft, F. (eds.) Historical dialogue analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 81-110

APA Citation style: Gloning, T. (1999). The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy. In Jucker, A., Fritz, G., & Lebsanft, F. (Eds.), Historical dialogue analysis (pp. 81-110). Benjamins.